The article goes into some detail about the workings of the plan and has perspectives from different parties who would be affected. I would urge you to read it and learn more (the link is below). Rather than go into the details, I have some thoughts of my own on the idea of capital gains taxes.
Over the past 50 years, there have been two presidents whose policies positively affected the country’s economy to a greater extent than any others: Presidents Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy. Presidents Reagan and Kennedy shared a number of qualities, one of which was the deep-seated realization that lower taxes promoted growth, and growth grew the real dollar-for-dollar tax revenues paid to the Federal government. They were both supply-siders; Kennedy long before this phrase was created.
Consider the phrase “capital gains.” It is a gain of capital, a monetary product which has already been taxed once since the investor of capital had to make that money before it could be invested. Most countries, some even more progressive than ours, do not have taxes on Capital Gains. They realize that the wealthy who put their hard earned money to work, money that is invested at considerable risk, should reap the benefits of gains because of the good work these funds create. It is a mistake penalizing them for helping the country’s economy to grow.
Imagine, if you will, that you plant a tree. As the tree grows more valuable the government taxes you for each incremental foot of growth, oftentimes before the tree has produced a crop. For each foot of growth, the government takes 15-25% of the growth from your pocket. Anyone with a lick of sense knows this is a crazy system and yet continues to grow the tree. Why? Because it is the nature of the entrepreneur to build something of value. Yet you dutifully fork over the cash value of the tree's growth because it is the nature of the government to tax your growth. This is a parasitic relationship that frequently dooms the entrepreneur. But back to you, the farmer.
There are risks to growing the tree and costs to maintain its growth. But you are forced to pay the government a part of your realized and often unrealized profits. If the tree eventually produces fruit some years in the future, the government then takes more of your profits. In olden days, this is exactly what the government did. They took the fruits, vegetables, and grains from the farmer before they were harvested. This planted the seeds, if you will, of our Declaration of Independence and Great Britain's Magna Carta, the two most important documents of the human evolution towards freedom from the rapacious growth of government parasitism.
But what happens when you, the farmer, decide that the government takes too much? They take too much at each stage of your investment in labor and capital. Do you continue to grow your tree - your business - even though it is becoming less valuable to you as the taxes increase? (Of course, if you plant it in a container you can pick up your container and go somewhere the taxes are not so high. This is what we are seeing in states such as California, where companies are packing up and moving to more business-friendly climates.) It is axiomatic that people of wealth are the ones who plant trees, start businesses and hire people. I have never seen ANYONE hired by a poor person.
It takes wealth to beget wealth and take the risk of capital to its ultimate stage: the development of a employee-rich business. When that happens, the economy booms. The business owner helps his or her employees to a good job with decent wages and benefits. Some of these people go on to start their own businesses and continue the economic cycle generation to generation.
This does not happen when the government strip mines the hard-earned cash of the investors and entrepreneurs. The wealthy harbor their capital until the economic, regulatory, and tax environment favors the safer allocation of their capital. Until that happens, the people with money essentially GO ON STRIKE. Kennedy and Reagan knew this at a visceral level and worked a considerable part of their presidencies seeing that the environment was conducive to business growth. The last time the wisdom of our political leaders embraced this philosophy was when Reagan repudiated the progressive taxes of the past administrations, and that set off the longest and largest peacetime period of economic growth in a century. That period lasted 25 years.
This could happen again and in doing so, pay down the national debt and bring the unemployment rate back to a more normal level. But that would take political courage, and that quality is lacking in our leaders today.
For more details about the bill, read “How a capital gains tax break could get cash to startups” at CNN/Money.com
Craig G. Francis is the owner of Francis Financial and The SBA Loan Store. He has been a top producer of SBA Loans since 1981, and has worked with Dun & Bradstreet and Bank of Commerce. Craig Francis has the expertise to steer clients through the often confusing rules and regulations associated with SBA Loans, having helped over 2,000 businesses acquire over a billion dollars in loans. He can be contacted through CraigGFrancis.com, SBALoanStore.com, on LinkedIn, or at 888-666-9722